Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • ...Feel free to update as fixes are made. [[User:Dmacks|Dmacks]] ([[User talk:Dmacks|talk]]) 20:59, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
    2 KB (220 words) - 21:48, 25 November 2014
  • :*<i>dmacks:</i> * <i>vasi&dmacks</i>: (on #fink?)
    2 KB (378 words) - 11:40, 11 June 2007
  • ** dmacks: complete overhaul of .deb (val-unpack branch) * dmacks: overhaul buildlocks to go away more automatically and have a cleaner clean
    3 KB (373 words) - 14:03, 12 December 2006
  • ...p mechanism. This would be useful even in for non-automated builds. [[User:Dmacks]] is working on it (thanks [[User:msachs]] for the code!)</s>No, because di ...bugged) we learn where to look to start resolving the issue. [[User:Dmacks|DMacks]]
    5 KB (822 words) - 02:10, 11 June 2007
  • ...is part of the .deb filename and control-file metadata), and [[User:Dmacks|DMacks]] doesn't think there is a need to worry about "upgrade paths" among platfo
    4 KB (590 words) - 13:16, 6 May 2010
  • ...most" symbols not chaning "that much" between ABIs of a lib. [[User:Dmacks|dmacks]] ** (dmacks clarifies) This is actually the opposite approach to the current IBD though
    7 KB (1,258 words) - 11:44, 11 June 2007
  • ...pendarwin.org/build/2005-11-07/ppc/logs/xmms.log xmms] (thesin has new %v, dmacks has patches for it but can't run it) ...k.opendarwin.org/build/2005-11-07/ppc/logs/libpostproc1.log libpostproc1] (dmacks may have fixed)
    12 KB (1,916 words) - 20:48, 9 May 2006
  • ...test mode (either enabled as part of -m or with a new option). (Actually, dmacks says that unknown fields aren't considered a problem, so maybe we don't nee
    2 KB (320 words) - 11:40, 11 June 2007
  • ** <s>and dmacks says: "Now just a minute, why doesn't index.php just do SELECT COUNT(DISTIN ...-man is present in current-10.4-transitional-unstable only. ([[User:Dmacks|DMacks]] 03:22, 30 January 2007 (CET))
    12 KB (1,914 words) - 06:15, 24 September 2007
  • ** <i>dmacks</i>: I see on #fink you also mentioned installing deps; good idea! Somethin * dmacks: abolish implicit <code>Source</code>? '''Not worth doing until [[Fink:Majo
    7 KB (1,063 words) - 13:09, 6 May 2010
  • ...pendarwin.org/build/2006-01-17/ppc/logs/xmms.log xmms] (thesin has new %v, dmacks has patches for it but can't run it (confirmed on #fink) *to dmacks
    14 KB (2,192 words) - 18:55, 5 April 2006
  • ...http://cvs.sf.net/viewcvs.py/fink/experimental/dmacks/finkinfo/gnome/ exp/dmacks] ...[http://cvs.sf.net/viewcvs.py/fink/experimental/dmacks/finkinfo/gnome/ exp/dmacks] runtime warning about XInputExtension and dumps core ([http://bugzilla.gno
    19 KB (2,035 words) - 09:21, 12 September 2016
  • 21:08 &lt;dmacks&gt; akh: 0.24.13 was still-born...okay to reuse its contellation for .14 if
    7 KB (697 words) - 19:10, 25 September 2012
  • # <s>dmacks: akh: Thinking of obsolete FAQs, the XML::Parser one is obsolete as of intl
    16 KB (2,344 words) - 15:10, 14 March 2009